Athletic Performance Academy – Latest news & updates from Athletic Performance Academy

APA Latest workshop: Speed, Agility & Quickness Training for Sports

Below are details of the next APA Workshop on Speed, Agility and Quickness Training for Sports.

SAQ for Sports

Date: May 24th

 

Location: Gosling Sports Park

 

Time: 9-12pm

 

Cost: £30  with 3 license points for Tennis Coaches 

 

For those of you who made the last workshop (of the same title) I encourage you to come to this one too! I want to pick up where we left off on the theory and get stuck in to some more practical and really consolidate our learning. 

For those who didn’t make the last one, don’t worry, I’ll give you a summary of the key theory on the day so you understand the key concepts behind the drills!  

Full details are at the link on the website

 

To wet your appetite check out this video of some of the work APA have been doing with our pro team Tennis players at Gosling Tennis Academy this winter pre-season!!

 

 

APA Announce New 1st4sport Level 2 Strength & Conditioning Qualification

This is the news you have all been waiting for!!!! Athletic Performance Academy (APA) are pleased to announce that APA Director Daz Drake will be running APA’s first coaching certification, a 1st4sport Level 2 Strength & Conditioning qualification.  The qualification is being run in conjunction with strength & conditioning education online, the highly successful S&C education business run by Brendan Chaplin.

 

Developed in partnership with the Rugby Football Union (RFU) the 1st4sport Level 2 Certificate in Coaching Strength and Conditioning for Sport (QCF) is designed to provide learners aged 16 and over with the level of knowledge needed to build and lead well-constructed strength and conditioning programmes through an understanding of how to plan, conduct and evaluate strength and conditioning sessions. This will enable successful learners to seek employment as a strength and conditioning coach in a number of settings such as a sports club, or with an athlete or team in an educational/youth environment.

 

Want to kick start your S&C career?

The reality is that currently there are no recognised strength & conditioning coaching qualification stepping stones to full UKSCA accreditation at this point in time.  The workshops are excellent but they don’t provide the attendee with a qualification at the end.  Therefore the majority of want to be S&C coaches are pursuing expensive qualifications in Gym Instructing and Personal training.  A typical Level 2 course in Gym Instructing will be around £400 and a Level 3 Personal Training qualification comes in at around £1000 plus.  This is not small change for any one, not least new up and coming S&C coaches looking to get themselves out there.  Wouldn’t you rather spend your money on a more relevant qualifcation that prepares you to work with athletes?

 

Save your club money!

APA are really excited to be offering this opportunity to aspiring S&C coaches.  Remember a Level 2 qualification is enough to let you run your own sessions so if you are a sports coaching business like many of APA’s partners are, and can’t afford to get an S&C coach to come in and run sessions for you on a part-time of fuller-time basis, then what are you waiting for?  Send one of your sports coaches on this course and let them run the technical sessions and S&C sessions for you!!!!!

 

It’ll be the best £ 370 investment your club could make all year!!!!!!!

 

Full details and bookings can be made at the link below:

http://www.strengthandconditioningeducationonline.com/home/level-2-strength-and-conditioning-qualification-gosling/

 

The Connected Body- Why you need to use Compound Exercises

Please enjoy our latest Blog contribution from APA coach Fabrizio Gargiulo        

Albinius-217x300

The human body is vastly complex, comprised of several ‘systems’. Some are commonly known, others less so. Today we take a look at one of these systems known as the Myofascial system. Most people understand the make up of the body as a series of muscles, tendons and ligaments attached to the skeleton, all surrounded by skin and protecting the vital internal organs. In this blog I aim to challenge the belief that muscles are individual and can operate in isolation and to explain why we (at APA) train our athletes predominantly in compound exercises.

The term Myofascial refers to the unit comprised of muscle and connective tissue. Myofascial meridians join the bones, muscles, tendons, ligaments, and connective tissue throughout the body in a web-like chain covering the whole body from the ground up to the head. The connective tissue is what connects a chain of muscles together. The muscles could and should be viewed, not as lots of individual muscles attached to bones, but as a single muscle running from head to toe that attaches at many points in order to allow movement. Indeed muscle is not even attached to bone directly but through the connective tissue – fascia. All too easily, however, we are seduced into the convenient mechanical picture that a muscle ‘begins’ or originates here and ‘ends’ or inserts there, and therefore its function is to approximate these two points. This is certainly how it is taught throughout academia, perhaps for simplicity, however a deeper understanding of the connective tissue enables the S&C coach to better plan and articulate training programmes.

The fascia acts as a ‘double-bag’ surrounding the bones, cartilage, and synovial fluid in the inner bag, the periosteum and ligaments forming the inner bag. The muscle fibres being in the outer bag, with the outer bag itself being formed of structures called fascia, intermuscular septa, and myofascia. In total all the bodies structures are connected via fascia, this can from time to time cause problems when one area is placed under stress or trauma, there is likely a chain reaction to another connected part of the body. However it can also work in the advantage of the body with the ‘transfer of tension’ enabling some outstanding feats of strength and athleticism.

 24c5ab58aa95ae330841407f3e4caa45

The principle researcher in the area of Myofascial meridians for many years has been Thomas Myers. Myers’ talks about the influence of injury on the fascial system with an analogy – if a tree falls on the corner of a building, the corner collapses but the building can remain intact. Much treatment therapy of the body operates with this view of the body – fix the broken part. If one looks at the body as a tensegrity model, however, the entire structure will give when a stress is applied in one corner. “Load it too much and the structure will ultimately break”. Ultimately the strain placed on a structure is distributed throughout that structure and the tensegrity of the structure may have a weak point, which I likely to be the place of collapse or in the human body, point of pain.

Within the human body there have been several ‘lines’ of fascia identified (sometimes known as sling systems) as shown in the diagram.

MYOFASCIAL_LINES

Athletic movements are dynamic by nature and utilise many if not all of these lines when performing sporting actions such as running, throwing, jumping, kicking a ball or swimming.  It is important therefore that we as strength and conditioning coaches consider the implications of the training we administer to our athletes – ultimately the goal of which is to improve performance and reduce injury risk.

 

Compound movement training is nothing new, but it is something we advocate highly at APA. Our athletes from a young age are taught strength exercises such as how to squat, lunge, push and pull. With sports such as tennis being multi-directional and explosive, we also focus on teaching landing mechanics, jumping mechanics, change of direction mechanics and Olympic lifting techniques. . Compound exercises are an excellent way of getting the body to utilise many of the lines or sling systems of fascia in the body to stabilise movement, produce power and decelerate the mass of the body.

 As our athletes develop, the early teaching of compound movements such as squats or Olympic lifts will gradually become loaded exercises. Thus enabling us to strengthen the entire chain of the body; myofibrils, connective fascia and the nervous system that feeds them in order to improve athletic performance. Once an athlete has fully developed, the intensity of the training they complete will be the increasing factor, designed to replicate the stress placed on them during competitive situations.

Specificity vs. Athletic training?

There has long been a discussion about training athletes in the specific movements for their sport. The methodology used at APA is to establish a fundamental athletic base from which sport specific training can be added onto. Our predominant athletic population is tennis players, however many of our young players (5-12yrs) will play various other sports alongside tennis, until they choose to focus on one sport. We encourage young players to participate in many sports whilst they are still developing the cognitive and proprioceptive skills needed. However as APA operates in a tennis environment, we train and improve the movements specific to tennis alongside gross motor skills and compound athletic exercises. One of the primary reasons for compound exercises being used is the range or extent of muscles used as part of the exercise and the cross-over or translation to movements within sport.

Examples of which can be found in the Olympic lifts – primarily challenging the superficial front and back lines – which focus on taking the body from a ‘triple flexed’ position to a ‘triple extended’ position under load. A not too distant example of a sporting move is the serve in tennis, although the added rotation and implements of the racquet and ball make it a more complex skill to complete, the muscular actions are very similar.

volleyball-genetics-tennis-serve snatch tech

Running and squatting also utilise similar musculature and fascial lines…

deep-barbell-squat-muscles-used  MuscleManRunning-1024x813

The superficial front and back lines are predominantly used for both running and squatting.

Throwing and kicking a ball also challenge connective fascial systems and so benefit from training the lines and muscles used in each action, such as squatting, lunging, pushing, pulling, rotating and overhead pressing. The lateral and spiral lines are both involved in actions requiring a degree of rotation.

ssjm0926giants  throwing action

As you can see in all the photos above the body is being placed under severe mechanical stress and it is the fascia and connective tissue that is holding everything together. Without compound training, the myofibrils of the muscles would be the primary target of strength training as in isolation exercises such as leg extension or bicep curls. By training compound movements we are improving our athletes’ whole body and everything that goes into physically performing an explosive task.

 

If you are interested in using APA to help you improve your athletic performance please get in touch.

Fabrizio Gargiulo

Speed, Agility & Quickness for Sports Workshop Review- Part 2

If you missed Part 1 read it here.  In Part 1 I gave a summary of the 1 hour presentation I gave to a group of 14 coaches, where I discussed the underlying qualities we should be looking to develop in our athletes which will go a long way to developing overall athleticism.  

In this blog I will focus on the practical elements we covered.  I found it a very challenging but equally rewarding experience trying to get across a whole training philosophy in 2 hours but feedback was positive and hopefully the audience took away the key points which I will summarise below  

Warm-up

We wrapped up the presentation by bringing together all the previous biomotor abilities into a warm-up method.  By doing a comprehensive warm-up you can prepare your body and mind for your speed session and at the same time put some extra work into developing your suppleness and your skills of balance, coordination and reaction speed.  

warm-up

We looked at different exercises we could use to develop these abilities including using a skipping rope, bands around the thighs for hip work, crawling patterns as well as performing locomotive tasks across the ‘width’ of the court to develop coordination.  After the warm-up we were now ready to get Fast and do some speed work!  

Kinematics

Do you have a picture in your head of what that perfect movement should look like?

KinematicsAgain Kudos goes to Duncan French who reminded me that while we can’t always have an instance impact on a lot of the qualities such as Strength and Rate of Force development that cause motion  (these require training), there are still aspects of movement we can improve simply by coaching the athlete into a better position.  Asking an athlete to get lower -centre of gravity (COG) or wider- base of support (BOS) is something they might be able to be cued on without them having got stronger.  They just became more aware.  So a lot of importance should be put on coaching athletes into correct positions NOT just motivating athletes.  

Coach it- don’t just motivate it!  

Now they were ready to learn about the APA Speed Development Training System

 

The 3S System

Speed- 3S

I introduced the 3 types of Speed that we focus on at APA described above- namely Straight ahead, First step and Multi-directional Speed.  We also talked about Footwork which for simplicity I refer to as a specific type of multi-directional speed in tennis.  

Importance of the Evaluation

Evaluation

Then the first thing I wanted to remind the coaches of was the importance of a good evaluation before getting into whatever drills you plan on doing. This can be a formal ‘fitness test’ at the start of a new working relationship but should also be part of an on-going training process of constant evaluation of the athlete.  In any given task I said they needed to know what the outcome was and what the process was to achieve it. The outcome is your ‘Final Skill’ and when it comes to speed it can be associated with a clearly defined timed measure of success such as running 20 metres in under 3.00-seconds or a pro agility 5-10-5 shuttle in under 4.5 seconds.  But remember we are playing sport so in tennis it could be feeding a ball so it lands in a certain area of the court and expecting your athlete to be able to hit it back!

 

Straight ahead Speed

Straight ahead speed

We started off with looking at the Target mechanics of Straight Ahead Speed. I suggested that for tennis I typically encourage all athletes to do at least some work to develop basic sprinting technique but it has increasingly less importance as the athlete begins to specialise in Tennis since there is no reaction to a visual stimulus.  Apart from the reaction to the starting gun it is a very closed skill.  

We started by discussing how you could evaluate Straight ahead Speed (SAS).   I said there needed to be an outcome so in this case that might be time based- sprint 5m in under 1.00 second (acceleration) and 20m in under 3.00-seconds (more top speed).  The process could be to sprint the first 10Y in 6 steps with a positive shin angle and 45 degree forward lean at the point of contact of the foot with the ground on the first step.  

I then discussed my drills progression from simple to complex

Speed drills progression

I typically observe and EVALUATE performance FIRST using a chaos situation where the movement is being evaluated in an open environment.  This can be a sports related game (such as a relay race in the context of SAS) or a drill which involves multiple speed qualities such as an obstacle course so that the qualities have to be applied under a bit of added challenge.  

Then depending on what I observe I will first cue the athlete to see if they can correct their body position.  If they can then I can go into more challenging drills and simply TRAIN that movement with more COMBINATIONS of skills such as a side shuffle into a sprint and reaction to a signal known as RANDOMISATION, or more INTENSIFICATION by using resistance from a harness or a partner etc.  

If they can’t correct it then maybe they lack some other qualities such as suppleness, strength or skill but it’s most likely a combination of all three and simply by putting some constraints in the environment and giving them some good feedback on what they are doing you can correct their positions.  This may require that you close the drill down into a simply closed drill with no added pressure- an ISOLATION drill.  

For Straight ahead speed (Acceleration) we looked at the following:  

Outcome: 10m sprint in under 1.72-seconds  

Process: achieve 10Y (9m) in 6 strides with 45 degree lean and positive shin angle on first step  

Drill 1: Isolation- falling start  

Drill 2: Combination- fast feet into sprint across court  

Drill 3: Intensification- harness pull from a paused forward lean position

 

For Straight ahead speed (Top Speed) we looked at the following:  

Outcome: 20m sprint in under 1.99-seconds  

Process: run on balls of feet and lift knees up  

Drill 1: Isolation- skipping rope run  

Drill 2: Isolation- straight leg shuffle  

Then we discussed First step Speed (FSS)

 

First step Speed and Multi-Directional Speed (MDS)

 

This is where (wherever possible) it is a great idea to use the tennis coaches to create a realistic open scenario ON THE TENNIS COURT to evaluate the performance.  We set up the drill as indicated below so that the person receiving the ball from the coach (Player 1) was working on his first step speed (Lateral) and the opponent receiving the ball from the player on the next shot (Player 2) was working on his Multi-directional speed.  

Evaluation

For First step Speed- Lateral (Player 1) we looked at the following:  

Outcome: On the court- Get the ball back and make opponent play after receiving a wide ball (just inside baseline) that he has to contact on the full run after shadowed a wide backhand in the other corner 

Off the court- Get around a Figure of 8 Cone course 4 times in 10-seconds  

Process: run with big powerful drive steps and use a closed pivot step across body on first step  

NOTE: We discussed the fact that there are at least 3 ways to move laterally off the mark  

1- with open step-jab  

2- with closed step- pivot  

3- with drop step- gravity  

The biggest influences over which one the athlete will use are the width of the base they start with (as it gets wider they move from 1 towards 3), the time they have to move (as there is less time they move from 1 to 3) and whether they start stationary or on the move (if they are stationary less are more likely to use 2 and 3, if they are on the move they will more likely use 1!!!)  

Don’t get hung up on this.  As long as they are dropping their centre of gravity towards the base of support then everything will work out.  If you feel they are not using the step you want then put some constraints in place such as the starting position of their feet or the speed, or height of the ball that they have to catch and the body will solve the problem!!!!  

Drill 1: Isolation-  Figure 8 cone drill  

Drill 2: Combination- side shuffle into lateral sprint to ball catch  

Then we discussed First step Speed (FSS) forward and backwards.  I said to the coach that there similar debates about this.  In Tennis we recognise the principle of Newton’s Law of Opposing Force so in order to go forward they will push directly back using a dig step when we don’t anticipate the forward movement.  However, if I know the only direction I will be asked to move is forward then yes, a forward step into the court without pushing back first would make sense.  Similarly, to go back we would first push forward slightly into the court before executing our drop step.  

We didn’t get time to properly go through an evaluation and process with these  but I think all the coaches got the principles.  

Finally we had a quick look at Multi-Directional Speed and Footwork.  Again, we were a bit rushed to go through a proper evaluation and process but we covered a few basic isolation drills.  

We did a tic-tac-toe drill for the footwork required to step out to a ball close to you.  I like to encourage stepping out to a ball close to you with an open step.  I suppose this makes sense as this is the opposite to sprinting to a wide ball using first step speed and a closed step!  

tic-tac-toe

 

Then we finished looking at some basic drills for Multi-Directional Speed.  I said that athletes needed to learn how to maintain an athletic position and got a coach to side shuffle in the service box while palming away tennis balls that I was throwing towards him.  I also showed how I used various hurdle combinations to train the basic body positions for learning how to plant and cut.

 

Hopefully next time I will do a similar format but spend less time on the presentation and spend more time getting stuck into the evaluations and the drills we can do to solve the movement problem.

Speed, Agility & Quickness Training for Sports Workshop Review

For those of you who were at the recent workshop as promised here is a review of the day.  We tried to get through a lot of topics so it’s probably a good idea to take stock of what we went through by reading this Blog.  For the first of our two part installment I will go over the key messages from the presentation.  In the next installment I will go over the practical exercises. 

For those of you who weren’t there we had 14 attendees, 10 of whom were Tennis Coaches, 2 who were Tennis/S&C coaches and 2 sports studies undergraduate students who are aspiring S&C coaches.  Therefore, the context for this presentation was the sport of Tennis!  It was a 3 hour workshop and we started with an hour presentation. 

Presentation

SAQ for Sports

For me the key outcome of the presentation was to take the Tennis coach into the world of the S&C coach and get them to see human movement through the lens of an S&C coach.  The great thing about working with sports coaches is that they will help us to keep focused on the bottom line, getting an improvement in performance where it counts, on the sporting arena, in this case the tennis court.  And this means that we need to make sure that our physiological adaptations will actually positively transfer to improved sports performance either immediately or at some point in the future. 

Equally we need to help the sports coach realise that there are a number of ingredients that go into helping an athlete realise their body’s full potential to express their athleticism, and not all of the reasons why an athlete may appear to move poorly on the court have to do with a lack of basic speed and power. 

Athleticism

So I talked about efficiency and explained that two key ingredients we need to produce efficient movement are:

 

1. Suppleness

 

2. Skill

 

Lateral cut

 

Suppleness: 

We talked about how if athletes have limitations in mobility that they will be unlikely to achieve the most desirable body positions to efficiently and effectively move.  I showed the example above of an athlete carrying out an aggressive lateral cut and saying how important it was to have ankle,  hip and thoracic spine mobility.  Also, remember that proprioceptive stability is only effective at the ‘normal’ length-tension state in the muscle so if you force the body to get into a position (as can happen at speed in dynamic situations) your proprioceptors in the muscle could be compromised.

 

Skill:

Skill

I wanted to make the point that strength & conditioning coaches can sometimes be guilty of focusing on physiological adaptations as a means to an end and will see it as the sports coaches job to ‘transfer’ those qualities to the sports field.  I feel that skill is an important biomotor ability that S&C coaches can also develop and I broke it down into:

 

1. Reaction speed

 

2. Balance

 

3. Coordination

 

If you think about the cycle of hitting a shot in tennis it ALWAYS starts with an action in response to something perceived in the environment.  You act or ‘react’ to the movements of the opponent and the ball, you then run to stop and hit the ball in a balanced position (or unbalanced position) and then have to time the segments of the body’s kinetic chain to produce the force (stroke production) at the right time.  The Tennis coach is the best person to develop the skills of reaction, balance and coordination as they relate to hitting the ball. 

Having said that, even though skill is traditionally thought of as the domain of the sports coach targeting these biomotor abilities in S&C sessions makes it easier for athletes to acquire the skills of their sport.   We are assisting the athlete to better organise their bodies by developing their senses especially vision, and proprioception.  

Reaction speed is traditionally thought of as the precursor to quickness.  It can be reactions which involve whole body movement such as a short sprint to chase a ball, but equally it can be the quick reflex action to duck when something is coming towards you, or the quick clap of your hand when you hear the coaching command.  It’s about training an immediate reflex (such as a fear response to danger) or train a response to the information in your environment.  The thing that makes expert performers appear so fast is they have trained this skill to a level where they can ‘act’ in anticipation rather than ‘reacting.’ 

Dynamic balance (stability) is reflex driven hence why balance exercises build upon postural corrective exercises. As well as doing all the physio type ‘activation’ exercises to correct poor static posture we need to do lots of jumping and landing and running and stopping to develop an ability of the proprioceptors to help us manage the body’s constant shifts in centre of gravity during dynamic tasks. 

Coordination is focused on the timing of the movement to get the correct body parts to fire in sequence.   Remember that every sport has a unique motor programme (technique) that is built on a basic coordination foundation.  We can perform get the athletes to perform all sorts of movement puzzles that require good timing such as running to jump and catch a ball in the air or performing sequences with the feet and hands.

 

Discovery Learning:

Discovery Learning

I finished discussing skill by making the point that these qualities are REFLEX DRIVEN meaning they are developed in response to changes in the landscape of the environment.  I used to believe that my role as a coach was to make my athletes look good; now I believe it is to challenge them to take them to the point where they struggle.  Beginners will be fine to start with predictable and pre-planned movements because they will bring their own inherent unpredictability to the party.  Think of the task of riding a bike going from doing it with stabilisers to doing it without.  But as soon as possible take the stabilisers off and let them discover how to solve the movement problem.  This is a metaphor for good coaching practice!

 Challenges like this will require Mental effort.  There is a clear Intent to stay on the bike and the Attention should be kept on external focuses such as avoiding obstacles.  This is called ‘Discovery Learning.’  The opposite is known as ‘Teaching’ and would focus on internal factors such as where to hold the handles, how to shift your weight on the bike and how fast to pedal etc.  There is a place for both.  I make a case for doing more  learning and less teaching.

 

Strength:

Kinetics- Force

Kudos goes to Duncan French who put me onto this.  We know that perhaps more than any other factor, strength is the biggest player when it comes to being athletic and specifically being fast.  Force into the ground is what causes acceleration (A=F/m) so bigger forces at the same body mass cause bigger accelerations!  You need force to overcome your own inertia but you also need even more force to overcome your own momentum and stop!  The qualities of force and rate of force development are where the S&C coaches really can take the lead on. 

Just remember, those adaptations need to help develop better performance on the sporting arena somewhere down the line.

 

Inter-disciplinary Team Integration:

Inter-disciplinary

And leads nicely to my last point and that is something that I think we should be clear on; how we work together to develop athleticism that actually transfers onto the court.  I think there needs to be an honest assessment of the skills that each member of the team brings to the party.  Some S&C coaches have a very vast sport specific knowledge base (and consider themselves a sport specialist), others may be limited in their technical understanding of the sport.  This works for Tennis coaches too; some have different levels of technical knowledge of their sport and different levels of S&C knowledge.  At the end of the day there is no single solution, every team and athlete brings different challenges.  But there needs to be joint accountability and the best interventions are always the ones that are followed through on together.

 

Louis Cayer said it best, when he said that, ‘a Tennis coach doesn’t need an S&C coach to make a tennis player move well on the court for one game.  But they need them to make them move well on the court for a match, a tournament and a career.’

Power endurance- earning the right to endure it!

So if you read the last blog on the Gosling Tennis Academy Pro Team Pre-season you will know that I promised you I would follow that blog up with more information on how the second half of the pre-season panned out.

As a guideline below is how I would ideally like to progress in my change of focus over the course of a training block if I had an extended period of time such as 12-15 weeks.  This would allow me to spend the first week or two building a foundation of strength endurance and then spend a good 6 weeks on strength/power and conditioning respectively followed by a week to 10 days taper. The bias between amount of time on strength/power vs. conditioning would be determined by the athlete’s needs. More fit athletes would spend less time doing conditioning  

Strength endurance > maximal strength > strength/power > strength maintenance/conditioning > taper

  

Given that most of the tennis athletes were coming in for 4-6 weeks only with a good baseline level of strength the aim was to spend the first 2-3 weeks focused more on strength and power and the last 1-2 weeks more on conditioning.  I felt that it was only going to be possible to focus on a couple of training goals in such a short period of time so I had decided to focus on developing the qualities of strength and power in the first few weeks and then learning to endure these qualities for the remaining few weeks.  Had the athletes been lacking in strength I might have spent more time focusing on developing strength and power.  Below is an example of how I would set the week up to focus more on strength/power.

Pre-season

   In this scenario there are 4 weights sessions.  I have gone into more detail on the rational for these sessions in the previous blog.  However, in summary I can say that there were two sessions that included heavy maximal strength lifts, 1 session (power circuit 1) that contained explosive lifts and a weekend session which contained muscle hypertrophy work only.  This way I was satisfied the athletes were getting a good dose of strength training but there was in built variation into the loads being worked against.  You could put the max strength lifts and explosive lifts into the same session but for reasons I have discussed in previous blog posts I wanted to separate the maximal strength and power over Monday and Tuesday.  

 

Explosive strength with Plyometric complexes

 

The power circuit I designed to develop explosive power used weights with plyometric complexes.  Pairing weights with bodyweight jumps can work well but in my opinion if used too much can just dull the neuromuscular system.  Use them judiously and it will amplify the training affect.  If you have more time than 4-6 weeks I suggest doing complexes toward the end of your max strength/power phase and then take them out in the final conditioning phase.  For the rest of the time you will get good gains by just focusing on doing the plyometrics and weights separately.

 

I had less time so I decided to bring them in from the beginning.  We set up three stations which the athletes worked through, starting with a moderately heavy explosive lift for 4 reps on each side and then following that with two plyometric exercises (around 8-10 reps) which were started within 75-seconds of the explosive lift.  Having completed one station of three exercises there was a 2-minute rest before starting the next station of three exercises.  Coaches like Dan Baker have shown that 50-60% 1RM works well for explosive jump squats and bench throws.  However, as the lifts were explosive by their nature they were using % of bodyweight as a guide and aiming for 50-60% of bodyweight.  So an 80 kg guy would be looking to snatch 24kg in each arm for two arm snatch or just the 24kg in one hand for a single arm snatch (as described below).

 

Power circuit

 

Earning the right to endure it!

 

Assuming the athletes were powerful enough to power snatch from hang with 50-60% bodyweight and were getting jumps above 60cm I was satisfied they had earned the right to endure the quality of power!  These athletes were well capable of achieving these benchmarks so I was more keen to develop their ability to endure power.  Therefore I made sure they also had a weekly fix of power endurance from week 1 (power circuit 2) with a view to doing it more in the conditioning phase.

 

Below is an example of how I would set the week up to focus more on conditioning.  

Power endurance week

 

Power Endurance circuit

 

Notice the increase in power circuit 2 to 3 times a week.  The rational being that we would drop down to 2 strength sessions.  The strength would now be in more of a maintenance phase while we ramp up the conditioning.

 For the power endurance circuit we started with 30:30 work and nearer the end we dropped to 20 second work and gave them more rest so it raised the intensity but also reduced the fatigue.  If I had more time I might have used a concept called a diminished rest interval set up.  Below is an extract from Eric Cressey’sUltimate Off-Season Training Manual
© Eric Cressey, 2006
www.EricCressey.com

 

Week / Rest Interval /  TrainingVolume

1 35s High
2 30s Medium
3 30s Very High
4 25s Low (Deload)
5 25s High
6 20s Medium
7 20s Very High
8 20s Low (Deload)


Week 1 serves as an introduction to football-specific
metabolic conditioning with a high – but not “punishing” –
volume of work.  
• In Week 2, the training volume is decreased, but the rest
interval is decreased to maintain a continuous training
progression.  
• There is no drop in the rest interval in Week 3, but the
athlete is forced to sustain the diminished interval from
Week 2 for a higher volume of work.  
• Week 4 serves as an opportunity for the athlete to deload
on overall training stress while introducing the next fivesecond
reduction in rest time between sets.  
• This reduction in rest interval is introduced in higher
volume in Week 5.  
• The 20-second rest interval for which we’re ultimately
aiming is introduced in Week 6 in limited volume  
• Volume at this final rest interval is amassed in Week 7.  
• The deload in Week 8 provides for a chance to remove
fatigue so that the athlete will be in position to display his
metabolic fitness at the beginning of Week 9.  
• This template may precede the preseason altogether in a
completely deconditioned athlete, while it would span the
late off-season and preseason phases in an athlete in
better metabolic shape (or, that athlete  may choose to shorten this phase to four weeks).  

 

So instead of the standard 30:30 I used to get them working with some fatigue  I could have maybe stuck with a fixed work period of say 20-seconds and slowly reduce the rest over the training block from 40-sec to 20-sec!!  Anyway, here is a video of some of the  exercises we used for our 30-sec work periods.

 

 

Phase 1: weeks 1-3: I typically started with 6 exercises 30 sec on and 30-sec off, 3 sets and 1-minutes between sets, progressing to 5 sets over 3 weeks.

 

Phase 2: weeks 4-6: I typically stayed with 3 sets and 6 exercises but used 20-sec on, 40-sec off.

APA Latest workshop

 

APA Workshop

Gosling Tennis Academy, 22nd February 2014 9.AM- 12PM

Workshop cost £30

 

Speed Agility Quickness

About the workshop:

Athletic Performance Academy (APA) will be hosting a workshop with APA Director and Head of Strength & Conditioning at Gosling IHPC, Daz Drake.  This workshop will bring together the presenter’s extensive experience and background in the field of youth and pro player coaching to give the participant a thorough overview of the current theory and practical application of basic to advanced techniques that can assist in the development of speed, agility and quickness for Sport.

 

Tennis coaches can claim 3 licence points for attendance

 

 

The content will include but is not limited to the following areas:

 

  • The theory and application of Speed, Agility and Quickness training for children, adolescents and pros
  • The two types of speed and how to train them
  • The two types of agility and how to train them
  • The four types of quickness and how to train them
  • An insight into the recent movement sessions conducted with 3 of the top 6 British Men Tennis players based at Gosling IHPC during the preseason

  This half day workshop will be split into two parts and will include a theory session and practical training.

 

About the presenter:

Daz drake 

 

Daz Drake is currently Head of Strength and Conditioning at Gosling Tennis Academy and is Director of Athletic Performance Academy who consult with numerous sports organisations in the south of England.  Daz currently looks after the S&C programmes of some of the top ranked male professional Tennis players in the country, including 3 of the top 6 ranked British Men players.

 

Click on the link below to save your place on the workshop!

 

https://athleticperformanceacademy.co.uk/product/speedagilityquicknesstrainingforsports/

Latest APA Workshop SAQ for Sports coming soon

Stand by for further details of the next APA Workshop on Speed, Agility and Quickness Training for Sports.

SAQ for Sports

Date: February 22nd

 

Location: Gosling Sports Park

 

Time: 9-12pm

 

Cost: £30  with 3 license points for Tennis Coaches (TBC)

 

To wet your appetite check out this video of some of the work APA have been doing with our pro team Tennis players at Gosling Tennis Academy this winter pre-season!!

 

Gosling Pro-Team Pre-Season 2013

Well, it’s got to that time of year again where the junior Academy programme quiets down for Christmas but the Pro team are back with a vengeance to really hit their training hard!!  Christmas time means only one thing in Pro Tennis- Pre-season!!!!  I get to work with our pro players for any where between 4 and 6 weeks of uninterrupted training.  

Work with the pros

 

Most of the guys came back the start of December 2013 and will train with APA up until the end of the second week of January 2014 ready for the British Futures circuit.  For those guys who are ranked inside the top 250 in the world they started a bit earlier because they need to be fit for the start of the Australian Open qualifiers.  It’s been well documented in British Tennis that Gosling Tennis Academy currently have 3 of the top 6 men in British Tennis training there! So some are staying in the UK and some are travelling to Asia/Australia for the ATP tour events!

 

For this blog I thought I would summarise the overall themes of the Training Blocks that these guys have been following and discuss some of the rational for the design of the training.  If you haven’t already read the APA Training Philosophy blog series I did in October 2012 I would definitely recommend you read APA Philosophy 8 on Training Density.  This is a pretty good overview of my thoughts on how to set up a training week for pro athletes.  It’s worth mentioning that tennis doesn’t really have an extended off-season.  After a few weeks off in mid November to recover from the long season (January to November!) they kind of jump straight back into training- which I guess is more like the pre-season of other sports.  Normally, you would be looking to develop qualities of speed, strength and power in the off-season over 2-3 months and then look to bring up the conditioning aspect of endurance in the pre-season over another month or so. As Tennis is not afforded the luxury of time you have to get the balance between developing the qualities mentioned above in a space of 4-6 weeks!!!

 

APA Pro-Team Training Block

 

My initial aim is to develop the important qualities of strength and power but also have one eye on the fact that they may be required to endure long matches right around the corner so we can’t neglect conditioning completely.  To achieve this I break the 6 weeks into two- the first phase is more focused on strength/power and speed.  The second part is focused more on endurance.  The first part has what I consider 6 sessions focused on neural overload (those in red or green boxes) and 4 sessions focused on metabolic overload (those in purple). The rest are either tennis sessions, recovery S&C sessions or off court classroom sessions.

 

Start of the Training Block: 

 

Pre-season

 

Figure 1. Pre-season week 2 of 5.

 

I’ve chosen week 2 to show you as week 1 was slightly different due to it including testing sessions on Monday and Tuesday.  Week 2 is a pretty good guide to the set up for the week’s training where I am focusing on strength, power and movement.  So basic structure is half-day Wednesday and full day-off Sunday.  The idea is that high neural demand activities that require the athlete to be reasonably fresh (strength/power and movement sessions) are done earlier in the week and/or following a rest day.  The highest volume of conditioning work is saved for the end of the week.  This way I can start the week with neural overload and finish it with metabolic overload.  Therefore, Monday and Thursday are big strength/movement days (lots of neural fatigue- planned specifically to be done the day after a rest).  Friday and Saturday are focused on conditioning.   

Note: all sessions in purple boxes are metabolic focused.  The power circuit on Friday is a metabolic session because it involves repeated efforts of jumps, throws and sprints with incomplete recovery.  The aerobic session is an submaximal interval session usually on a bike, and the anaerobic session is repeated sprints on a tennis court, again with incomplete recovery.

 

Neural vs. Metabolic Training

I did think about leaving out the conditioning session on Tuesday afternoon.  There are a lot of coaches that will say don’t mix your neural and metabolic sessions in the same day, especially if the last session of the day is metabolically demanding.  The rational being that you will dilute the training effect and the body will remember the last training stress of the day and adapt to that most.  But I put the aerobic session in because I wanted to make sure that the athletes were getting a sufficient volume of training in on the full days (3 sessions a day of S&C including the recovery session) and I felt there was still a strong enough emphasis on neural work over the course of the two days to warrant them doing one conditioning session (aerobic intervals) as the last big session of the day on Tuesday.

 

Strength vs. Power vs. Hypertrophy

 

In my previous blog on Training Density I talked about how in-season I normally go for 2-3 weights sessions per week due to the competing demands of the athlete’s sport.  Well in the off-season/ pre-season I’m open to going up to 4 or 5 sessions because this is the only time I can create enough fatigue to overload the body without worrying about them being able to perform in their sport.  I guess the template I have gone for is similar to the one Olympic weight lifters use where there is two days of push (maximal strength- Monday and Thursday).  But I haven’t gone for two pull days (power -typically done on Wednesday and Saturday).  I’ve gone for one power day (Tuesday) and one more hypertrophy only day (Saturday). They are power endurance athletes so I replaced one of the power sessions for a power endurance circuit.

 

Maximal Strength:  

I personally subscribe to the view (which is supported by research- see blog for more information) that you only need to do 2 maximal strength sessions per week to develop strength in advanced lifters.  I consider this particular group advanced because they can all squat between 1.5 and 2.0 body weight on their 1RM test to good depth (thighs parallel). Therefore in this programme I have elected to do 2 maximal strength sessions (Monday and Thursday) with the first session having a more lower body emphasis and the second having a more upper body emphasis.  However they squat in both sessions.

 

The power session is on Tuesday.  I will go into more detail on how I do a power session for Tennis players in another blog.  For now just appreciate that they combine a moderately heavy explosive lift (such as a high pull) with a body weight jump or medicine ball throw.  They are not fatigued while doing these supersets.  Now again you could question why it follows the day after a maximal strength session- it should be Wednesday right, like the Olympic wieightlifters?  This would surely give them more recovery?  Or at least do it on Monday before you do the Maximal strength session?? Well, again it goes back to what I am trying to achieve.  I wanted to create neural overload in the first two days (Monday and Tuesday) and make sure I created metabolic overload on Friday and Saturday.  I wanted to have rest days on the Wednesday and Sunday to recover from this BUT I was content to do the power session with a little bit of fatigue because I really wanted to make the maximal strength session my priority and do this when they are fresh.  I was happy for the power session to be in the presence of a little bit of fatigue, knowing that the weights would be a bit lighter.  I also felt the previous day’s heavy lift could potentiate the following day’s explosive lifts.

 

The Saturday hypertrophy session was a weight training session but without any maximal strength (primary/secondary lifts) or explosive power lifts.  If you read my blog on Exercise Selection you will see this session is pretty much just muscle conditioning (just assistive and auxillary movements).  Because it can be a big ask to expect the athletes to come in on a Saturday for a half day I like them to look forward to this session because it is what I call a vanity session.  They do plenty of functional single joint exercises but there’s also room for them to pick a few exercises for their arms and work the guns!!!  By including this session this means they are doing 4 sessions in the weights room during this training week which I feel helps to ensure there is a good focus on getting stronger in the early part of the training block.

 

Well that pretty much sums up the overview of a typical training week at the start of the pre-season.  In the next instalment I will look at the training week for one of the final weeks of the pre-season where conditioning is the focus.

 

Below is a quick video we made to highlight some of the work the guys have been doing.  Hope you like it.

 

 

Plyometrics – Don't Run Before You Can Walk!

Plyometrics training has been used for the past 50 years in athletic training and has been shown to increase jumping performance (Markovic, 2007) especially in dynamic power sports such as tennis, basketball, football and volleyball. For an exercise to be considered plyometric the use of the stretch shortening cycle by the active muscles must exist with a high intensity eccentric contraction followed immediately by a rapid and forceful concentric contraction (Markovic, 2007). Common forms of ‘plyometric’ exercises include various types of jumping, hoping, bounding and bouncing. Popularly jumping over objects and onto boxes features heavily on YouTube videos from around the world. However it is important to consider what makes an exercise plyometric and not just a dynamic movement done at speed. In this article I shall describe the importance of plyometrics, explain what, why and when you should include different levels of plyometric drills and discuss the volume of plyometrics used in an athletes’ programmed load.

Why should you include plyometrics in an athletes’ training program?

An increased power output is an important characteristic of successful sports players. Plyometrics should only be added to a training program after a good foundation of strength has been established via strength training (Cormie, McGuigan, and Newton, 2011). This has been a common view for several years, however if we examine the physiological effects of plyometric training, whereby significant – up to 10x bodyweight – load is place through the bodies’ muscles, ligaments and tendons, which all combine to create a stretch shortening reflex and a power output, it is possible to find simple everyday exercises than also create similar effects on the body. Everyday examples include running, jumping, hopping, bounding or quick changes of direction. Most of these movements are limited in adult daily life by choice of how we move – we don’t run everywhere or have to jump across gaps in our path like our primal ancestors, however one population group that do several of these movement patterns by choice are children.

Children love to play, it increases their learning via sensory feedback and children enjoy running, chasing, jumping, climbing, changing direction etc, especially if this is masked as a game or even sport. However most children will not have a formal ‘strength training’ background. So does that mean we shouldn’t let them do plyometric ‘training’? Ultimately a discussion on this topic will have to wait until a future time where it can be discussed. However my initial take is that ‘plyometric’ activities are a primal form of ‘exercise’ in which we would outrun, jump or throw objects at potential dangers. The fear of injury has led to us questioning this type of training and wanting to find ways of improving our young athletes. Whilst I believe it is important that young athletes complete strength training, they will already be doing plyometrics within their sport, for example; tennis players are taught to split step and be light and agile around the court, this involves many plyometric type movements and muscle contractions. Therefore I see the role of the S&C coach to improve the factors that could lead to injury – landing mechanics, deceleration drills and strengthening of the connective tissues around joints. Teaching young athletes how to perform jumping, quick ground force reactions and balanced landings correctly will also help, however I feel that large doses of plyometrics training is not necessary and should not be prioritised ahead of strength training and fundamentals.

Back from this tangent, adult and older or rather more developed adolescents that are involved in a competitive sporting environment should have plyometrics as part of their training. Once a good strength base has been established – values of up to 3.0 x body weight across compound lifts – more advanced plyometrics exercises can and should be used. However as stated at the beginning of this piece, these more advanced exercises are often utilised too early in the stages of development and without having completed the basics first. Overall the aim of the plyometrics is to increase power across a very short space of time – less than half a second. Therefore the speed of the exercise should be of paramount importance ahead of the loading, difficultly or volume. With younger children all the way through to adults simple starter exercises such as skipping (jump rope) and agility based games will encompass several of the outcomes desired.

Additional benefits of doing lower level plyometrics can mean an increased volume can be used, a lower risk of injury occurrence and a focus on ground reaction times and stiffness through the ankles can be coached. First step quickness and reactions to external stimuli also increase speed in games play. These skills can be worked on with low level plyometric exercises and will have a significant impact on performance, especially in younger athletes. As stated earlier, many quick feet and low level plyometrics will be used in a games situation, with younger athletes – under 12 – where they may not have chosen a sport they wish to focus on, small sided or 1v1 games such as mirroring, ball drop reactions, tag and agility races will engage the player greater than strict drills focusing on running technique or box jumping.

This video shows a few examples of quick feet, low level plyometrics and reaction games that can be encompassed into plyometrics sessions at any level.

Once an athlete has been involved in physical training for a period of time which enables them to be stronger, less susceptible to injury and have greater power outputs an increased level of plyometrics can and should be used to develop elite standard athletes. There are many flashy videos available to watch online, however most are impressive feats of jumping onto or over objects, few encompass the eccentric component of the stretch shortening cycle or rebound nature of quick ground reaction times. One must also look at the relativity of certain plyometric exercises to specific sport movements, for example box jumps are not a part of any sport but are a particular favourite of the S&C coach. Rarely do you see lateral plyometrics exercises being showcased on videos; however it is important that athletes can control stretch shortening cycles. Some of the best athletes that utilise plyometrics most effectively can be showcased in this video.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NX7QNWEGcNI

Free runners or Parkour athletes have fantastic spring in their movements (stretch-shortening cycle) and are also adept at landing. They train for their sport by doing their sport. This is not always the best approach, but as discussed above many of the training qualities a coach may wish to encompass can be integrated into games and sport specific movements. The key to increasing the difficulty of the plyometric exercise is to start small with the movements and maintain the speed of contraction and quick ground force reaction time.

When it comes to the amount of plyometrics you should include in a session there is a lot of differing arguments about how much is too much. Typically I would stick to around 60-100 foot contacts for most sessions. 60 ‘hits’ would be a low volume session, 100 medium and 120+ a high volume session. A ‘hit’ is counted as a single ground force reaction. An example of which is a two-footed jump or bounce and land, however single leg exercises would count as 2 ‘hits’ as the same amount of load is placed on half the ground reaction surface and therefore equates to twice the load as an equivalent. So 10 tuck jumps would equal 10 hits, whereas 10 single leg hops would equal 20 hits. This is important to consider when counting the number of repetitions in a session or over a period of time such as a training week. What is counted as a rep? An important question also. I would only count the reps where a maximal intention to produce force following a stretch-shortening cycle (load-unload) has occurred or an eccentrically controlled landing has occurred. Due to the forces involved in plyometric exercises, especially jumping, I would not recommend anything greater than low level plyometric exercises for beginners. The joints and structures particularly in the legs – knees, ankles – and in female exercisers (larger Q angle and common valgus knee alignment issues) are in a vulnerable state if not physically strengthened prior to engaging in this type of activity.

In conclusion, plyometric exercises are great for increasing power output from an athlete. An appropriate strength training program should precede dynamic explosive exercises but low level plyometrics can be encompassed concurrently alongside strength training. Care should be taken with the level of athlete, their past training history, age, gender and injury history being taken into consideration.

 

Fabrizio Gargiulo