Deceleration- The Forgotten Factor

With the end of a third lock down in the UK behind us, we haven’t slowed down in our vision to be the Best Tennis S&C Team in the World.  We are committed to a weekly CPD session and last week Konrad gave us an exceptional presentation, the content of which we wanted to share with you! We welcome back APA coach Konrad McKenzie with a weekly guest post.

 

Deceleration – The Forgotten Factor

 

Last week I spoke about what I had taken away from Nick Winkleman’s “Language of coaching”. Today I wanted to write about an insightful paper that I happened to stumble upon. “Efficient deceleration: The forgotten factor in Tennis specific training”. Whilst I am not entirely convinced that it is a “forgotten factor” I acknowledge the provocative title. This paper is excellent and I am excited to share it with you. Today’s topics (based on the paper) are:

 

  • Deceleration components
  • Lower and upper body deceleration
  • Deceleration components explained further
  • Five exercises for you to try

 

As always I am using this as an opportunity to write about what I have learnt in the hope that it directs you towards the paper, rather than simply regurgitating it. So, I implore you to read it through the link here

Four major deceleration components

 

I thought I would mix the order of the paper to enlighten you on 1) what deceleration is 2) Why it is important 3) and what are the rate limiting factors to deceleration performance. Deceleration simply put is the reduction in speed or rate. Sufficient deceleration is pertinent to most field and court sports but in Tennis in particular, deceleration is important in order to set up prior and recover after the shot.

In the upper extremities deceleration occurs in the arms and shoulders after ball contact (e.g serves and groundstrokes). As mentioned deceleration is multifaceted, meaning that it has components for successful performance.

 

“Training acceleration is important to improve athletes speed, however it may not transfer if athlete cannot decelerate faster velocities in appropriate time frames & under control”.

 

Interestingly, the percentage breakdown of total distance covered in respective speed bands during the Australian open years (2012-2014) showed that the majority of movements occurred under 3m/s highlighting the multi-directional explosive actions and sudden braking demands. In the junior game players may experience deceleration speeds of up to -5.2.m/s. This demand will vary for individuals with larger body mass as a result of momentum (Mass x Velocity).

 

 

(Photo credit: Kovacs et al., 2008)

 

I will elaborate on these topics later however, the paper catergorises the major components components of deceleration as:

 

1. Dynamic balance

2. Eccentric strength

3. Power and

4. Reactive strength

 

As scientific thinkers we like to catergorise things into neat little boxes however as we can see by the next picture in the deterministic model of deceleration there are a few factors that influence it. We must not forget the skill component.

 

 

 

(Photo credit: Kovacs et al., 2008)

Lower and upper body decelerations

 

I will now delve a bit further into the deceleration of the lower body and upper body and what is occurring at these regions.

 

“Deceleration is trainable bio motor skill and as such, needs to be included in a well-rounded tennis specific training program”

 

As mentioned above training acceleration should not be neglected however, the paper suggests that athletes need to able to decelerate the faster velocities in the appropriate time frames in order to be effective. Check out the figure below, the athlete pictured needs the strength (along with balance and coordination) to accelerate into the forehand and decelerate immediately after ball contact.

 

(Photo credit: Kovacs et al., 2008)

 

Also check out this world-class rally where this is mentioned further. Something else to note is that high braking forces during the “penultimate step” can increase the risk for injury (Dos santos et al.,2018) if change of direction technique and strength levels are poor.

 

 

The body uses eccentric contractions after ball contact in virtually all serves and ground strokes. These contractions are of vital importance, virtually all strokes require deceleration of the upper extremity within the kinetic chain. High powered movements such as the serve require high levels of strength around the scapula and shoulder region, due to the large forces generated by the internal rotators such as the Latissimus Dorsi and the pectoralis Major. These muscles accelerate the arm forward for an explosive ball contact, all this is happening with an arm elevation of the arm (approx. 90-100°).

 

After ball contact an increasing demand is placed on the Scapula-thoracic stabilisers (Infraspinatus, Teres major, Teres minor, serratus anterior, trapezius and Rhomboids) as they perform eccentric work to decelerate the arm as it continues to internally rotate. Interestingly Fleiseg et al reported forces of up to 1 x bodyweight through the Gleno-humeral joint. Kovacs argues that players lack the vital deceleration capacities in the upper body which amplifies their risk of injury.

 

Deceleration components of deceleration explained further  

 

This article goes into quite a bit of depth regarding the four components, I will touch on these briefly to avoid making this blog too long.

 

Power and reactive strength

 

Power is said to directly translate into greater racket head speed and ball velocity. Increased power qualities is said to improve the athletes ability to brake via the restrain mechanism. The restrain mechanism also serves to protect the structures of the hips knees and ankles. Reactive strength is enhanced as a result of training due to the adaptations in the sensorimotor system. From a neuromuscular perspective the stretch reflex is initiated during the eccentric (landing) resulting in greater motor unit contraction during the subsequent concentric action. A longer term adaptation to Plyometric training is the desensitization of the Golgi Tendon Organs (GTO) which allows the elastic component of the muscle to go through a greater stretch. In terms of performance this results in an increase in power and speed.

 

Eccentric Strength

 

Training an eccentric contraction requires selecting exercises which lengthen muscles under tension. An example eccentric action in tennis would be in the loading phase in a shot or the penultimate step. Tennis movement places an asymmetrical load on the body and it is argued that these uneven loading patterns are trained eccentrically. A lack of eccentric strength in the lower and upper extremities heightens the risk of injury. The paper has training recommendations for this if you wish to delve deeper but I was particularly interested in this:

 

“Length–tension curves for single fibres (sarcomeres), whole muscle, and single joints all have different shapes. As the result of these different shapes, it is vital for the athlete to be trained at a variety of angles and torques to stimulate adaptations in as many muscle fibres as possible to capture the greatest effect on altering the length–tension relationships specifically during eccentric dominant movements.”

 

Dynamic balance

 

Firstly dynamic balance is the ability for an athlete to maintain a stable centre of gravity while the athlete is moving. A well balanced athlete allows to successfully use the segmental summation of muscular forces and movements through the kinetic chain (Kibler, 1994). Efficient energy transfer from the ground up through the kinetic chain will result in more efficient and powerful tennis stroke. I’ll assume that the paper accounts for Rhythm, timing and proper contact with the ball. In a recent webinar that I took part in, the word “confident” was used as opposed to “Certain” which, in my opinion, encapsulates the complexity in human performance and Tennis. By enhancing dynamic balance we allow for proper intermuscular coordination reducing the chances of compensatory movement patterns. Whilst experts do not agree on athlete specific balance, researchers suggest that changes in both sensory and motor systems enhance balance (Bressel, 2007).

5 exercises for you to try

 

The paper has some exercises which are used to enhance the eccentric and rate of force development capabilities around the shoulder girdle and in the lower body (Hip extensors, Glutes and hamstring muscles). I will add in some exercises outside of the paper which I also found interesting.

 

  • 90/90 shoulder prone plyometric drop

See Video example HERE

 

  • Reverse catch deceleration

See Video example HERE

 

  • Medball side lying drop catch

 

 

  • Split Stance RDL

 

 

  • Lateral hurdle run with hold

 

 

Tennis is a wonderful game which challenges fine motor skills, inter and intra muscular coordination. Preparation for the Tennis athlete is by no means a simple task if we appreciate the competing demands of the sport. I hope you have enjoyed, please read the paper for a more in depth discussion.

 

 

Thanks for reading guys,

Konrad McKenzie

Strength and Conditioning coach.

Liked This Blog?

You might like other blogs on this topic from APA:

APA review of the Middlesex Students S&C conference 2014

The Dubious Rise of the Corrective Exercise ”Pseudo-Physio” Posing as a Trainer- My thoughts

as well as two recommended articles:

This article on weak Glutes during Squatting

And this one on Exercise Modifications 

 

Do you feel that this would be a perfect time to work on the weak links that you have been avoiding? The things that you know you should be doing that you keep putting off? Would you like us to help you with movement screening and an injury prevention program? Then click on the link below and let us help you!

? TRAIN WITH APA ?

Aspiring Pro Training Support Packages

 

 

Follow me on instagram @konrad_mcken

Follow Daz on instagram @apacoachdaz

 

Remember:
  • If you’re not subscribed yet, click here to get free email updates, so we can stay in touch.
  • Share this post using the buttons on the top and bottom of the post. As one of this blog’s first readers, I’m not just hoping you’ll tell your friends about it. I’m counting on it.
  • Leave a comment, telling me where you’re struggling and how I can help

 

Since you’re here…
…we have a small favor to ask.  APA aim to bring you compelling content from the world of sports science and coaching.  We are devoted to making athletes fitter, faster and stronger so they can excel in sport. Please take a moment to share the articles on social media, engage the authors with questions and comments below, and link to articles when appropriate if you have a blog or participate on forums of related topics. — APA TEAM

 

=> Follow us on Facebook

=> Follow us on Instagram

=> Follow us on Twitter

Pacey Performance Podcast REVIEW- Episode 348 Keith Baar – PART 2

This blog is a review of the Pacey Performance Podcast Episode 348 – Keith Baar

Keith Baar

Research Gate

Background: 

Keith Baar

 

Keith is a Professor in the Department of Physiology and Membrane Biology at the University of California Davis, and Head of the Functional Molecular Biology Lab.  The goal of the laboratory is to understand the molecular determinants of musculoskeletal development and the role of exercise in improving health and performance.

Keith completed his PhD at the University of Illinois looking at the mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) in the maintenance of muscle mass.

 

Discussion topics:

 

Daz comment – here is quick overview on the role of the tendon and the process of remodeling, before we dive into Keith’s podcast talk with Pacey Performance.

 

  • Tendons have the ability to store and release energy like a spring, and to be stiff with standing loading.  These attributes allow efficient running and jumping.
  • Tendons need tension to adapt and cartilage need compression.
  • When a tendon is loaded appropriately it adapts by strengthening, and becomes stronger by increasing ‘stiffness‘, NOT by becoming thicker.
  • It is also possible to relatively unload a tendon, either when returning from injury or in the case of athletes who vary from being relatively unloaded, having appropriate load, to excessive unloaded.
  • The unloaded tendon becomes stress shielded, whereby the superficial portion of tendon bares too much load and the deep portion too little.
  • The stress shielded tendon under normal or even excessive load can become reactive.  The reactive tendon will try to ‘thicken‘ to reduce stress.

 

Taken from Andrew Walker, Physical Therapist.  You can see the full video later on in the blog

 

Isometric training for train the tendon, where’s your head up with that?

So the first thing is anytime you load the tendon, isometric, eccentric, concentric muscle work, the tendon gets the same signal if the tendon is happy. If it’s a healthy tendon, it doesn’t matter how you train it. The muscle, the genetic response varies based on the type of load, the tendon it doesn’t vary. So all that means is that you could do any of them on a healthy tendon. And so that’s the important thing. If your tendon is perfectly healthy, no problems at all, you can train however you want. You can do lots of ballistic movements. You can do whatever, whatever isometric, eccentric, concentric movements you want.

 

 

The difference appears when you get some sort of injury to the tendon because when you have an injury to the tendon, now what you get is that section of the tendon doesn’t get loaded when we do normal dynamic loading. We have a paper that should be coming out in the next little bit where my PhD student Danielle has put a biopsy punch to put a hole in the middle of a rat patellar tendon. So right in the middle, just like you would see in a lot of, kind of chronic patellar tendinopathy, it’s a central cord tendon injury right up near the patella. And then what she’s done is we’ve waited 15 days for that to form this tendinopathic tissue. And interestingly, the genes that we see expressed in that tendinopathic tissue are the exact same ones that we see in human tendinopathic tendons.  So the rat tendon is modeling that human tendinopathy.

 

Isometric vs. Dynamic Muscle Contractions for Tendon re-modelling

When we then do either four isometric loads, and these are overcoming isometrics that are held for 30 seconds. So they’re very long isometrics with two minutes of rest in between, or we do the exact same time under tension matched and length of time of loading matched using dynamic movements. So they’re one third of a second and we give one third of a second dynamic contractions to the muscle or to the tendon. When we take out that tendon, we look at the genes that are expressed…………

 

The one that did the isometric loading has the expression of tendon.

 

So we see tendon specific markers go up. We see collagen Type 1 go up. In the one that had the dynamic contractions on it, so it’s dynamically loaded and it’s a central core tendinopathy, we actually see genes going up that are more similar to what you would see in fibre cartilage (compression like genes);  because as you pull it really quickly, what we get is we get stress shielding around the injured area.

 

Figure – Stress shielding key concept to understand why partial damage to the injured tendon can prevent rupture. How do you get load through the area though? Tension (not compression which creates cartilage).

 

We get that stress shielding, because the tendon it’s what we call an ISO-volumetric tissue. That means as I stretch it, I’ve made it longer. So in order to make it longer and keep the same volume, it has to get skinnier. So as I pull it up, if there’s a hole in the middle, the sides are then compressing the middle. And if there’s no tensional load, because it’s been disconnected from the tension above and below, now you’ve only got a compressive force. You’d no longer have a tensional force. So the reason that isometrics become important in that situation is because as I pull and I hold at that longer, skinnier length, what’s happening is the sides of the tendon where it’s still healthy are relaxing, just like we said, with creep or with stress relaxation.

 

And now what happens is the whole tendon becomes less stiff because I’m holding it there and there’s a decrease in the tension within the tendon. And as it becomes less stiff, I actually get tensional load through the injured area of the tissue. And when it feels that tensional load, now it knows, oh, I should be a tendon and I should express these genes and it starts making those genes. But when we just dynamically load and we do these faster movements, we don’t see that. And so that’s when it becomes important to use isometrics for a tendon. You can use, and I know track athletes who use what they call isometrics for very short, like 0.2 second isometrics, where they’re just going to go up as hard as they can hold it and drop. For me that, that doesn’t really count as an isometric because yes, the joint hasn’t necessarily changed its length, but the muscle has shortened because it’s taken up the tension within the tendon.

 

 

So there’s beautiful work out of the University of Calgary that shows that if you do an isometric load, which means that you keep the joint at the same angle, the muscle is shortening, the tendon is lengthened. And that makes sense to most of us because yeah, you can see if I go and I isometrically load my bicep, my bicep becomes bigger. That’s what a bodybuilder does. Isometric and they flex their biceps. Well, if it’s happening that way, that means that the muscle is shortening, even though the elbow joints in our bodybuilder example, isn’t shortening. So you’ve got a shortening of the muscles. So it’s, the muscle is still contracting concentrically, but the joint isn’t changing. So the really short isometrics as people call them, aren’t necessarily isometrics in the way that we’re thinking of muscle and tendon.

 

Long isometrics to induce stress relaxation of tendons

 

What I’m thinking of when I say isometrics are long isometrics, and I use them as a way to induce what’s called stress relaxation, which is basically as you pull on the tendon, the strongest parts of the tendon relax, and you see that as a decrease in the tension within the tendon. And that decrease in tension within the tendon gets to its low point around 30 seconds. So about 30 seconds of an isometric hold on a tendon, the tendon’s tension will have gone down about 45%. So that the tendon will have stretched and the tension within there has gone down a huge amount. If I go all the way up to three minutes, it won’t have gone down much more than another 5%. That’s why I use that 30 seconds.

 

 

When you’re doing a 10 second isometric, you’re going to get some of that, but it’s not going to be as complete a relaxation. You can get other things that are really important. People use them to overcome, like when people have issues with where they feel like they can’t increase the weight and they’re a strength athlete, they can use isometrics as a way to kind of take advantage of the fact that we’re stronger in the isometric than we are in the concentric. And now we can slowly overcome and build through stopping points within our progression. So people can use them for a whole bunch of other things, but for the tendon component, we’re using it for that stress relaxation at that 30 second time point.

 

What does overcoming mean in terms of an example of an exercise and what alternatives are there to overcoming?

 

Overcoming isometrics

”Perfect, so what a lot of people do is the classic leg extension machine, which I know people, those are the machines that people have to go and find them on eBay because nobody’s used them in 40 years. But a lot of people just take it, put the weight at the bottom, kick out as hard as they can, and basically hold it for 30 seconds. What I tend to do is I tend to give people a yoga strap. I gave them a handheld dynamometer (there are some that are sold from San Diego that are like a hundred bucks). So it’s a really good tool because basically now I can have you kick out against that yoga strap onto that handheld dynamometer, it’ll go to your phone and it’ll show you how hard you’re pushing for 30 seconds and it’ll time you for 30 seconds and you just keep it that way. Or you can do like a hamstring curl. And all it is, is that you’re in a position, you are trying to overcome the weight and you’re not, and the weight is not yielding. So basically the weight is more than you could lift. And as a result, an overcoming isometric is you’re always trying to overcome the weight, but it’s never possible, you’re not strong enough to do it. And usually you do it from the longest position of the muscle, so from the greatest muscle length.

 

So if you’re thinking of a hamstring curl, it’s a straight leg position where you’re about to pull in. If you’re doing a leg extension, the knee is at 70 ish percent and you’re trying to push it out as hard as you can. And so that’s the overcoming isometric.

 

Yielding isometrics

 

The yielding isometric what we’ll do with this one is we’ll push up a weight on leg press with two feet, and it’s a weight that you can lift with two, but you can’t lift with one and it’s really heavy for one. And then you take away one and you’re just trying to hold it there and you’re not trying to yield.

 

Technique: Low Jerk isometric

 

Okay, so you’re basically, like with most of our isometrics when we’re trying to get tendon and muscle working optimally is that we found that if you can get to high force without a lot of jerk, which means that you’re not moving the weight abruptly. So when you’re doing an overcoming isometric, you don’t kick out as hard as you can immediately. What you’re going to do is you’re going to develop force over about a two second period where you’re slowly raising force. You’re going to hold that maximum force and you’re going to let it off easily.

 

If you’re doing that, that’s what we call a low jerk isometric and that’s really what we’re looking for isometrics. We want them to be in a long muscle length because it seems like, and again, I have a PhD student who’s going to specifically look at what the muscle length should be during these isometrics for optimal tendon health, but from some of the clinical work that we’ve done, we’ve found that a longer muscle length actually has a better outcome for both the muscle and the tendon. And again, you just think of it as that’s usually where when you’re at a longer muscle length that means that the stretch on the system is going to be the greatest.”

 

Is there any differences in terms of adaptation and muscle tendon in the two types of isometrics that you just described?

”Nobody’s done the experiments yet, to be honest. So we’re early days with this, as far as experimentally, how these types of loads actually affect both the muscle and the tendon. The tendon, what we’re focusing on is this stress relaxation component, but it could be that there’s other things happening there because the other thing that we’re doing is we’re actually producing a very high force movement, or high force contraction with the muscle. And that’s going to stimulate the matrix of the muscle as well as the muscle to get stronger.

 

One of the reasons that we use heavy strength training in our training, for every single athlete that we work with, is because that heavy strength training is going to make the muscle stronger. And if you go back to the beginning, we said that injury to the muscle happens when the tendon is stiffer than the muscle is strong. So if I make the muscle stronger, now the likelihood of me getting a muscle pull is going to go down. And you saw that, you know, last year after the Champions League final, when they showed all these pictures of the guys from Bayern Munich, and they were all these big hulking people. A lot of the reasons that you’re doing strength training is to make sure that the muscle is stronger than the tendon is stiff.

 

You talked about fast and slow training and the benefits of both, why it include both. Would you mind just touching on that for us? 

”Yeah, sure. So what we’ve got is that, as I said, a tendon is what we call a variable mechanical tissue. That means on the muscle end, it’s stretchy and on the bone end it’s stiff. And the way that we maintain that muscle and compliance is through our activity. And we know this because we did a study in rodents where we actually cut the nerve to the muscle, so the muscle couldn’t contract anymore. So that’s the same thing that would happen if you put yourself in a boot or if you had a lot of time off or you’re sitting for a long time. And then what we found is that, whereas on a normal animal, we see the muscle end of the tendon’s really compliant and the bone end’s really stiff, after we cut the nerve and we let them not be able to load it for five weeks, the muscle end of the tendon was just as stiff as the bone end of the tendon.

 

And so what we think is happening there is that there’s some beautiful work by Talia Voke that showed that if you look at the muscle end of the tendon, you have fewer cross-links than the bone end of the tendon. And so what we think is happening is that as you load with a heavy weight, and when we say a heavy weight, it’s not about the heavy weight, it’s about the slowness of the movement. Again, when we’re talking to athletic trainers they are always like , ”we have to do it slow lengthening contractions because that fixes tendinopathy.”. It’s not about the slow lengthening contractions, it’s about the slow. And when we do a heavy concentric work, that by definition, a heavier weight force velocity relationship means you’re doing it slower.

 

So we want a heavy weight for two reasons. One is it’s going to make the muscle stronger. The second reason is that it’s going to allow us to break cross-links within the muscle end of the tendon, because as you move more slowly, because it’s a viscoelastic tissue as we talked about before, that means that the collagen molecules within the tendon are going to actually slide past each other. And it might not be individual molecules. It might be fascicles because the interfascicular area’s really active within a tendon. And so a tendon has this really interesting organization where it goes from fibrils to fibres, to fascicles to the whole tendon and those fascicles can slide past each other as well as some of the fibres sliding. And when that happens, we break cross-links between the adjacent fibres, fibrils or fasicles. And as we break cross-links, the cross-links make it stiffer, so when we break them they becomes less stiff.

 

So we do heavy, slow training, what we’re doing is we’re getting the sliding of the collagen molecules at the muscle end of the tendon. That’s going to allow us to break cross-links at the muscle end of the tendon. That means the muscle end of the tendon is going to be a little bit stiffer. Doesn’t mean the tendon or the muscle or the muscle tendon unit is going to be less stiff because as you’re doing the heavy strength training, you’re also giving a stimulus to the matrix and the muscle that’s going to make that stiffer. So overall, if we took out the whole muscle and tendon, you might actually see an increase in stiffness, but the muscle end of the tendon’s going to decrease in stiffness just a little bit, and it’s not necessarily enough to decrease performance, but it will potentially impact that.

 

Now, when we do fast training, what’s happening is because it’s a viscoelastic tissue, the collagen in the tendon is stiffer. So instead of having that sliding because the collagen molecules are working like individual molecules, what you get is that as you move faster and faster, the collagen molecules work together as a sheet instead of as individual molecules. And when they’re working together as a sheet, you’re not sliding them past each other, so you’re not breaking any cross-links. When we do any type of exercise, concentric, eccentric, fast, slow doesn’t matter, you get an increase in the enzyme that makes cross-links. So when you do slow exercise, you break cross-links and then you start making new ones, but you don’t make as many as you’ve broken, so your overall stiffness over time will decrease.

 

When you’re doing really fast movements on a low weight, now what you’re doing is you’re not breaking cross-links during the exercise, and then you’re adding more cross-links afterwards, so over time you’re going to get stiffer. Okay. And the other thing that happens, because when we’re doing fast movements, by definition, those fast movements are against the lighter weight and that means that our muscle, if that’s the only thing it’s exposed to is going to get less strong over time. So now we’ve got a stimulus by doing these fast, fast movements where we’re increasing stiffness of the tendon, decreasing the strength of the muscle. Now we’re going to get into a point where the muscle is not as strong as the tendon is stiff and that’s when we get our muscle pulls.

 

That’s why when you get into the Olympics, if they happen as scheduled in a hundred or so days, when we get to the track and field in the men’s 200, 400, you’re going to see these guys pulling up with hamstring problems, pulls, because basically they’ve been trying to go as fast as possible so that they can maximize their performance for this one opportunity. And then they get a little bit tired. They over stride a little bit, they hit the ground and the muscle isn’t strong enough to stretch that tendon. And so instead of the tendon stretching, now the muscle stretches when it’s at full length and that’s when we get those hamstring pulls.

 

And again, it’s going to happen in the men’s because the women, because of the effects of estrogen, estrogen can directly inhibit that enzyme, which adds cross-links. That’s why they get more lax in the knee and fewer muscle pulls. So we wouldn’t expect it to happen as often in the women’s 200, 400, but we’d expect it to happen more often in the mens.”

 

Another thing you spoke about was the multiple hits per day. Is that something that you do in terms of encouraging people to do that? And is there a time limit or maximum time, minimum time that you’d recommend?

”Yeah, so we definitely do that when we’re coming back from injury.  The research comes back to some things that we did in our little engineered ligaments, and that’s translated really nicely into the human recovery work that we’ve been doing. And so what we found was that we’ve got a minimal effective dose of loading, which means the tendon stops feeling load after about 10 minutes. So the cells, because it’s like the tendon cells, or maybe a 13 year old kid, because they’ll listen to you for a little while and then they stop listening to you entirely. And it takes them a while before they’re going to listen to you again. So they’re more like 13 year olds who still listen a little bit, 16 year old, doesn’t listen at all. So now that 13 year old is going to listen to you our tendon cells for about 10 minutes of activity. And then after that, you can continue to be active, but it’s going to not pay any attention.

 

 

So it got all the signal it is going to get from that 10 minutes. And then what we showed is it takes about six to eight hours to recover that ability to signal again. And so, yeah, you can do two bouts or three bouts a day if you’re in recovery and you’re really dead set on recovering as fast as possible. What we do is a morning session, which is five to 10 minutes of activity, and it could just be range of motion activity, where you’re just getting basic load through the tendon. We’re going to wait six to eight hours, so around noon then, we’re going to do another 10 minutes of activities, wait six to eight hours at night before bed. And all of those three bouts are going to give you that minimal effective dose, which is going to give you the signal to adapt as quickly as possible without giving you all of the extra mechanical load that comes with longer periods of training.

 

And then what we do is we go from those three bouts, we’re going to progressively increase the length of one of those bouts because we have to increase cardiovascular fitness and muscular fitness, so endurance capabilities. And as we do that, we’re going to keep the initial two other bouts as protective for the connective tissue and then as we progressively increase the length of that main session, what we’re going to do is we’re going to then slowly go into a two session a day period where one is a protective session for the connective tissue. The other is a session for tactical, for cardiovascular, for muscular fitness. As far as healthy individuals training, yes, you can do that as well. If your sport is really about performance, about really high intensity, really quick movements, you can do short periods of high intensity movements that are going to last a very short period of time between, you know, even just a 10 minute session is going to have enough to give you the signal that you need.

 

So what you could do is you can easily, say you’re a sprinter and you need to be as explosive as humanly possible. Now what you’re going to do is you’re going to do one really explosive session in the morning, 10 minutes, bang, you’re done, that’s it, we’re done. Then you’re going to come back and you can do your track work in the afternoon. It’s going to be a little bit more, but now that’s six to eight hours later, the cells are able respond again, but we’ve had two sessions instead of just one big session. And we do see that that does provide an extra stimulus for adaptation.”

 

The importance of nutrition. I think I found this fascinating, importance of nutrition in the return to play process based on your work and your thoughts, can you give us a bit of an overview of that?

”So there what we’ve seen is that and this again comes back to our engineered ligament work, where we noticed that when we increased the amount of proline and we increased the ascorbic acid in the media of our cells, they actually got a whole lot stronger, the ligaments did. And so we, I just went and said, okay, what’s a food that’s rich in proline and glycine? And of course, collagen or gelatin comes up. And so we did the first study on this in humans with the Australian Institute of Sport. And what we showed is that when you had 15 grams of gelatin an hour before you did six minutes of jump-rope, again, minimal effective dose of loading to load the bone to give us a stimulus for adaptation. What we found is that when we did that every six hours, we saw an increase in collagen synthesis just by doing jump rope every six hours.  And then we saw a further increase when we had the 15 grams of gelatin.

 

So it does look like that, the collagen synthesis component can be stimulated by collagen or hydrolyzed collagen or gelatin. We’ve just finished the study that we’re trying to get published. We’re in the second revision in the paper and what we’ve done there is we’ve given hydrolyzed collagen or a placebo control to our American football team here at the University of California, Davis when they were doing their strength training. So this is the off season, they’re doing heavy strength training. And like we’ve said, heavy strength training actually decreases rate of force development because all you’re doing is moving slow. And so even when you try and include some ballistic movements, that’s still a dominant thing when you lift really heavy for a number of days.

 

But when we included the gelatin in there, what we saw was that we actually didn’t see as big a decrease in rate of force development. And the rate of force development recovered much, much faster to the point where at the end of the study, the group that was in the hydrolyzed collagen group had actually improved performance as far as their eccentric rate of force development for counter movement jump. For a lot of these performance measures, their maximum isometric strength, they actually saw an increase in their rate of force development there as well. So you can see a performance benefit potentially to the collagen as well.

 

Caffeine can inhibit collagen synthesis

 

One of the things we’re working on right now- we went back to some of the old research we had done and sure enough we’d found that caffeine can inhibit collagen synthesis. So what we had been telling people to do is because you’re taking the collagen an hour before you do your training, you can just put it to your pre-workout supplement, which often has, is a big dose of caffeine and it about three mgs per kg. But it seems like that caffeine potentially could be inhibiting collagen synthesis. And so I don’t know if it’s enough where that caffeine is actually going to circulate enough to have that effect in vivo, but at least in vitro studies, we can show a dose dependent decrease in collagen synthesis with caffeine. And our engineered ligaments are actually, you know, some of the work that I did a few years ago showed that they’re actually about half as strong as the ligaments that were grown without caffeine.

 

So now what we’re doing is we’re maybe shifting how we’re doing the pre-workout supplement. So we’re trying not to give it directly with caffeine, because again, we’re trying to target the nutrition to where we’re going to be using it. So we take it an hour before we do the loading. That’s a way that you can kind of deliver it into the areas that are going to be loaded, where you want the extra glycine and proline and all of these collagen essential amino acids to be. And so we don’t necessarily want to have caffeine together with it at that time, because we don’t want them going together to the tendon because we’re going to see less collagen synthesis than if it was just the collagen alone, or even if, you know, the caffeine seems to be inhibiting it below baseline levels.”

 

The principles of rehabbing a tendon, is that different for different tendons?

”It’s a great question. We haven’t seen any difference between the tendons we’ve looked at. We’ve actually even used a similar protocol to regenerate the patellofemoral cartilage. So we had an NBA basketball player who had eroded the patellofemoral cartilage to the point where there was obvious MRI data that said that there wasn’t much left, but we were able to regenerate that pretty fully using kind of a compression, relaxation, compression, relaxation, an hour after we had given some hydrolyzed collagen and vitamin C. And so it’s a way that if you can get the load through the tissue and you can get the nutrient in there and you can kind of get it to flow in through so the cells are getting the stimulus they need (in the case of cartilage it’s compression, in the case of tendon is tension) and then you’re giving that in association with providing the amino necessary, you can see increases in collagen synthesis, whether it’s cartilage, whether we’ve seen it in bone, and we’ve seen it in tendon as well. And it doesn’t seem to matter which tendon we’re looking at.”

 

Top 5 Take Away Points:

 

  1. Tendons need tension to adapt and cartilage need compression.
  2. Use Long isometrics to induce stress relaxation of tendons
  3. Use low jerk isometrics to develop force over about a two second period where you’re slowly raising force
  4. There is a place for fast and slow training in the programme
  5. Minimum effective dose- 3×10 mins for tendon remodeling seems to be optimal.

 

Want more info on the stuff we have spoken about?  Be sure to visit:

 

Twitter:

@Musclescience

You may also like from PPP:

 

Episode 372 Jeremy Sheppard & Dana Agar Newman

Episode 367 Gareth Sandford

Episode 362 Matt Van Dyke

Episode 361 John Wagle

Episode 359 Damien Harper

Episode 348 Keith Barr

Episode 331 Danny Lum

Episode 298 PJ Vazel

Episode 297 Cam Jose

Episode 295 Jonas Dodoo

Episode 292 Loren Landow

Episode 286 Stu McMillan

Episode 272 Hakan Anderrson

Episode 227, 55 JB Morin

Episode 217, 51 Derek Evely

Episode 212 Boo Schexnayder

Episode 207, 3 Mike Young

Episode 204, 64 James Wild

Episode 192 Sprint Masterclass

Episode 183 Derek Hansen

Episode 175 Jason Hettler

Episode 87 Dan Pfaff

Episode 55 Jonas Dodoo

Episode 15 Carl Valle

 

Hope you have found this article useful.

 

Remember:

  • If you’re not subscribed yet, click here to get free email updates, so we can stay in touch.
  • Share this post using the buttons on the top and bottom of the post. As one of this blog’s first readers, I’m not just hoping you’ll tell your friends about it. I’m counting on it.
  • Leave a comment, telling me where you’re struggling and how I can help

 

Since you’re here…
…we have a small favor to ask.  APA aim to bring you compelling content from the world of sports science and coaching.  We are devoted to making athletes fitter, faster and stronger so they can excel in sport. Please take a moment to share the articles on social media, engage the authors with questions and comments below, and link to articles when appropriate if you have a blog or participate on forums of related topics. — APA TEAM

 

=> Follow us on Facebook

=> Follow us on Instagram

=> Follow us on Twitter

Pacey Performance Podcast REVIEW- Episode 348 Keith Baar – PART 1

This blog is a review of the Pacey Performance Podcast Episode 348 – Keith Baar

Keith Baar

Research Gate

Background: 

Keith Baar

 

Keith is a Professor in the Department of Physiology and Membrane Biology at the University of California Davis, and Head of the Functional Molecular Biology Lab.  The goal of the laboratory is to understand the molecular determinants of musculoskeletal development and the role of exercise in improving health and performance.

 

Keith completed his PhD at the University of Illinois looking at the mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) in the maintenance of muscle mass.

 

Discussion topics:

 

So in terms of injury rates, why are injury rates still on the rise?

 

”Well, the first reason is that because we get paid on performance (athletic trainers, strength coaches, all of these performance people). And a lot of performance is down to maximizing properties of the musculoskeletal system that actually puts you at an increased risk for injury.

 

And so what is the delicacy and what’s the real art of performance science is to balance performance against injury rate. Because as far as I’m concerned, I’m going to shift more towards injury rate. I’m going to decrease injury rate because if I decrease injury rate, my athletes are going to have more time in practice. They’re going to be able to have more sessions. They’re going to be trained more frequently. And over time they will progressively get better.

 

The problem is many coaches and performance directors don’t have that long view because their job is going to be determined in the next six months. So if they don’t win it now, they’re not going to be there long enough to have the opportunity to see the benefits of what they put in place. And so a lot of times what we’re doing is we’re making short-term decisions when we really need to look at long-term progression.

 

While we still have this system where everybody is judged and the coach is going to bring in his own performance team and all of these things, we’re going to still have this cycle.

 

Could you give us a overview about the role of the tendon, the function and how they actually adapt, if that’s alright?

 

”Sure. So I think the best thing to do is to start off by looking at tendons and ligaments, because these two things are often grouped together. And the reason that they’re grouped together is they’re structurally very similar. They’re at least 70% type I collagen and that collagen is supposed to be aligned along the line of force. In a ligament, you’ve got more than one direction of force sometimes, so you get maybe a little bit different alignment than you would do in a tendon.

 

And what we’ve got in these structures are collagen protein, and that collagen protein is cross-linked together. And that cross-linking is going to alter the stiffness of the structure. So the stiffness of your tendons and ligaments is down to how much collagen you have, what direction the collagen is going and how cross-linked the collagen is.

 

 

Ligaments

 

And so when you have a ligament, what a ligament’s job is to do is to keep a joint from being lax. So is to keep a joint really sturdy. And so the stiffer your ligaments are the better because you don’t want movement within the joint. An example is if we increase the laxity of the knee joint so that there’s 1.3 millimeters of extra give in the ACL, we have a fourfold increase in the rate of ACL rupture.

 

So anything that’s going to give us small changes in ligament stiffness, or laxity of the joint is going to be bad. And so a ligament, we want it to be as stiff as possible. And that’s because it’s going to connect two bones together and the two bones are going to be super stiff.

 

Tendons

 

If we look at a tendon, the real difference between a tendon and a ligament is  a very basic property. A tendon is attaching a muscle to a bone. And so that means on one end, it’s attaching to something very compliant or stretchy. And on the other end, it’s got something stiff. And if you were to give an engineer a job of attaching something that’s really stretchy to something that’s really stiff and hard, they would have night sweats because this is the exact thing that is the most difficult thing to do as far as engineering that structure. And so the tendon is  a unique tissue in the fact that on one end it’s stretchy and on the other end, it’s stiff. And so it’s a variable mechanical tissue. That means that the stiffer your tendon is not always the best option, whereas in the stiffer the ligament, the best option, always stiffer; stiffness is better.

 

Tendon, it’s a little bit different because it has to connect to a compliant muscle.

 

If it’s too stiff, if it’s stiffer than the muscle is strong, that’s when we get non-contact muscle pulls.

 

If we just compare female athletes to male athletes, because we said that as stiff as possible is great for the ligament. Well, we know that women playing the same sport have a four to eight times higher rate of ACL rupture. That’s telling us something about the laxity of the ligaments, that they’re less stiff than the men. But they also have 80% fewer non-contact muscle pulls. So what that’s telling us is that when the stiffness is low, we get ACL ruptures. When the stiffness is low, we get fewer muscle pulls.

 

In contrast, when the stiffness is high, fewer ACL, fewer ligament problems and more muscle pulls. And obviously as a strength or a performance person or a manager, you want to have muscle pulls over ACLs every day. But at the same time, you don’t, you also want to try and eliminate those muscle pulls as much as you can. And that’s where the intricacies of tendons and ligaments and this muscle tendon unit science really take off because to train such that you’ve got stiff tissues for your ligaments, but you can modulate the tendon’s stiffness by using your exercise. That’s really where  you’re making your living if you’re a performance or a strength coach.”

 

What’s the role of the tendon in dynamic performance such as sprinting and jumping?

 

”My definition of a tendon is it’s something that’s there to protect the muscle from injury. From a standpoint of a performance person, it’s there to transmit force as quickly as possible. Okay, so the stiffer a tendon is, the faster I can transmit the force being produced by the muscle to the bone, and that’s going to increase performance.

 

So really what I want to do with my tendons for performance is I want to have them as stiff as possible. And the reason for that is that if you think of a weight on your desk and you attach a rubber band or elastic band or a stretchy band, and you pull on the stretchy band, what’s going to happen is it’s going to stretch and the weight’s not going to move. And that’s really what would happen if you have hyper-laxity. If you have really stretchy tendons, you pull on that tendon and the bone, which is our weight on our desk, doesn’t move.

 

 

If you now switch that to a rope that’s a braided material, as you pull on it, it’s still going to stretch a little bit, but because it’s a lot stiffer than the stretchy band, now as you pull on it, it stretches a little bit, and then the weight moves. But if I instead have a steel rod there, as soon as I pull on the steel rod, now that bone or that weight on my desk is going to move immediately. That’s basically what we talk about when we talk about rate of force development. When we talk about rate of force development, what we’re saying is how quickly can we get from the message from your brain, to the contraction of the muscle, to the movement of the bone. And that last bit, the contraction of the muscle to the movement of the bone, that’s where your tendon stiffness comes in.

 

If you want to perform at your best, ideally, you want that tendon to be as stiff as possible. But again, the way that you do that is you’re going to increase stiffness. And then the stiffness of the tendon, if it gets stiffer than the muscle is strong you’re going to have muscle injury. So this is where we’re trying to balance these two things out. We’re trying to balance the performance side, where the higher the stiffness, the better for performance with the potential for injury side, which is if my tendon is stiffer than my muscle is strong, I’m going to get a non-contact muscle pull. And so that’s really where our performance people or performance scientists are earning their money.

 

So how do we know as sports performance practitioners, if we’re getting that balance right or is it before we get the injury idea?

 

”So again, what you would do is if you’re at a max performance sport, like you’re a track and field, and you can do everything where you just have to be your best for, you know, for that one event, then what you do is you practice that. And that means in a non world championship, non Olympic championship year, you actually push yourself to the point where you get a non-contact muscle pull. Because that what that’s done is that’s told you, okay, in this individual, what is my ratio of fast movements to slow movements or heavy movements that is going to optimize their performance? And then where am I going to get to that point where if I pushed it too far, I’m going to get a pull? Now, once I know that, I can go back and I can program knowing that in the past, this is where we’ve been. Once we get up towards that level, now I can manipulate training to keep us as close to that without overcoming that.

 

In a situation like a team sport, where you’ve got a whole bunch of people, what you’re going to find is that’s going to be extraordinarily difficult because each individual has a different set point. And so if you’ve got a whole team, first of all, they don’t have all the same training load because everybody’s going to have positional differences. Second of all, they’ve got different genetics, which makes them either more prone or less prone to injury. And so what you’ve got is you’ve got to really break it down to individualize the training and the performance based work for each individual athlete, if possible.”

 

How stiff is stiff enough? And I’d like to get you up your thoughts on that as well.

 

”Again, this comes down to what’s your performance? So if you’re in Rugby Union and you’re one of the big guys, and you just have to absorb a lot of force you don’t need to be extraordinarily stiff.  If you’ve got the big, huge guys, so in American football, it’s the lineman. So they’re big, huge linemen, these guys are like 6’6 about 110, 120 kilos. So they’re big. And what they’re doing is they’re absorbing force. I don’t need much stiffness in that athlete.

 

I like to talk to manual therapists, physical therapists, athletic therapists, who are hands-on, they’ll tell you that there’s two types of athletes. There’s the muscular athlete and then there’s the stiff athlete. And just by touching them they know what type of athlete.

 

I need stiffness for the people who are going to have high end speed, have to jump super high. Any of these ballistic movement performances, that’s where I need stiffness. And in that situation, what you want is you want the stiffness that’s necessary to perform the movement, but no more. It’s just like flexibility. I don’t want somebody to be so flexible that they’re now hyper lax, and they’re going to increase the risk for injury again. So injury rate and stiffness is a U shaped curve. So if you are very inflexible, there’s a high injury rate. If you are very, very flexible, there’s a high injury rate. And in between, you’re going to get into this kind of shallow area where you’re at the optimal flexibility or at the optimal stiffness, your injury rate is relatively low, your performance is relatively high.

 

How do I have a quantitative way to say this is it? What I would do, the best thing that we have found so far is to use stuff like counter movement jumps or other things, and look at the slopes of the eccentric impulse. So this is the rate of force development eccentrically. And if you’re going down and up and you can look and you’re seeing big changes in that slope, what that’s telling you is that if you’re increasing the slope, that means you’re getting stiffer. And as you get stiffer, you’re going to find that you’re going to get to a point where you’re going to get a non-contact muscle pull. That for you is now going to tell you where you should be. Again, what we don’t have yet in elite athletics, or especially in non elite athletics, is any type of quantitative measures that say, here’s us tracking it over time. Oh, look, you picked up an injury when you got to this point, this other athlete picked up an injury when they got even less of a slope change. So that means you’re more resilient. You can do more high stiffness work. This person’s less resilient. You can do less.

 

So what we do is we use injury history a lot of times. And when I get an athlete who’s got an injury history that’s very long, that’s got lots of non-contact muscle pulls, now what that’s going to do is that’s going to change how I’m going to train them. Because I don’t want you to be the fastest player on the team and play two matches over a season. I want you to be the top five fastest players on the team and play every match in the season. And so that’s where I’m going to shift the way that I’m going to train to try and maximize or optimize your performance.”

 

So in terms of individual differences, is there, is it a huge range?

 

”There’s a massive range. There’s going to be those two or three guys who’ve pulled their muscle every year. It’s like, oh my God. Yep, he yawned, he pulled a muscle, you know, it’s that kind of thing every time. And then there’s going to be people who they’re a little bit slower. They actually can accelerate a little bit better. So they’re better able to decelerate accelerate, but they’re really bad at their high end speed. Those people tend to be more resilient as far as these non-contact muscle pulls, because their muscle is going to overcome inertia. So your acceleration deceleration, that’s your muscle base. The people who are the fastest people at the top end speed, those are the ones and they have a really hard time slowing down and speeding up.

 

So, it’s your connective tissue that is going to allow you to continue and to move as high a speed as possible. So if you’re really good at high end speed, but not so good at acceleration deceleration, that’s going to tell me that you’re going to be much more likely to get a non-contact muscle pull. If you’re really good at acceleration deceleration, I’m going to guess that you’ve not had a lot of non-contact muscle pulls.”

 

A minute ago, you talked about flexibility and this U shaped curve. If people want to be at the bottom and want to make sure that they stay there in terms of building that flexibility, but not becoming hypermobile, what would be your recommendations?

 

”Yeah, so what we do is, for our flexibility, for our range of motion type of work, what we’re doing is we’re not doing any kind of static based stretching because that’s not ideal as far as how we’re activating the system.  There’s a bunch of physical properties that these tissues have, that tendon has specifically, but that matrix has in general. And those are these viscoelastic properties. So that means that the tendon is going to behave both like a liquid and like an elastic solid. And that’s really important for us as a performance measure, because the faster you move, the stiffer of viscoelastic surface becomes.

 

So if I’ve got a viscoelastic tissue, if I go fast, it becomes stiffer. So we can do these tests in our laboratory where we’ve got a machine that’s just going to pull and it can pull at different rates.  And what you can do is you can watch it and it pulls super fast. It’s going to break earlier, but it’s going to have really good stiffness in the tissue. If I pull it really slowly, it’s going to stretch a lot further and it’s not going to take as much force and it’s going to be much less stiff. So if I pull and I hold on a tissue, like a tendon, you get creep, which means I’ve pulled it and then it’s going to slowly come back down. And that’s fine and that’s what you get with static stretching. What we want to do that slightly different is we want to actually continue to maintain the load on the tendon while we’re getting this kind of creep. And that’s called stress relaxation instead of creep. The difference is that when we do stress relaxation, we’re using muscle contraction to continuously load the tendon.

 

When we’re doing creep, we just go into a position where the muscle tendon unit is longer, or we just hold it there. And eventually it slowly relaxes, but there’s no tension across it. And so the tension of the whole system goes down together. When you use a muscle contraction to do that, now what you’re doing is you’re allowing the tendon to continue to get a load across it. But because the tendon is slowly relaxing, the strong parts of the collagen are relaxing, now what you’re getting is you’re getting a signal from the muscle and a signal from the tendon that correspond to each other. The tendon feels load, the muscle is creating load. When we do a static stretch, what we’re getting is we’re getting a disparate signal from the two tissues. One, the tendon is under load but the muscle’s not under load. There’s no contractility, and so what you get is you get this almost counter-intuitive to the two sensors within our musculoskeletal system, the Golgi tendon organ, and the muscle spindle, those are changing in two different ways.

 

And so that’s potentially giving us mixed signals that could potentially increase injury rate. And the example I give is our NCAA athletes. So the athletes where you think, okay, if you were to think of an athlete who should have really stretchy tendons, you would think probably of gymnasts. And you would think that these gymnasts are really super flexible. Well, two years ago, 17 NCAA gymnast ruptured their Achilles tendon. And so it’s not about, and so they’ve done lots and lots of passive stretching. They’ve done lots of holds. A lot of coaches actually have them sleep in those little devices that hold the toe back so that they get more flexibility in the Achilles. And yet here they are rupturing their Achilles faster than any, or more than any other athlete group. And it’s likely because they’re doing that passive movement and that passive movement isn’t increasing flexibility. What it’s doing is it’s changing the Golgi tendon organ reflex. And so slowly over time, the Golgi tendon says, oh yeah, this kind of stretch on the tendon or this kind of load on the tendon is normal. So it doesn’t have that really quick reflex that’s going to assist you at protecting your musculoskeletal system.”

Top 5 Take Away Points:

 

  1. Risk: reward – a lot of performance is down to maximizing properties of the musculoskeletal system that actually puts you at an increased risk for injury
  2. Ligaments vs. Tendon – the stiffer your ligaments are the better; tendon is a variable mechanical tissue. That means that the stiffer your tendon is not always the best option
  3. Role of tendon- to protect the muscle from injury. From a standpoint of a performance person, it’s there to transmit force as quickly as possible
  4. Know your limits – you actually need to push yourself to the point where you get a non-contact muscle pull.
  5. Static vs Dynamic stretching- dynamic stretching is better as it applies a stretch to the tendon and continues to apply a load on the tendon.

 

Want more info on the stuff we have spoken about?  Be sure to visit:

 

Twitter:

@Musclescience

You may also like from PPP:

 

Episode 372 Jeremy Sheppard & Dana Agar Newman

Episode 367 Gareth Sandford

Episode 362 Matt Van Dyke

Episode 361 John Wagle

Episode 359 Damien Harper

Episode 331 Danny Lum

Episode 298 PJ Vazel

Episode 297 Cam Jose

Episode 295 Jonas Dodoo

Episode 292 Loren Landow

Episode 286 Stu McMillan

Episode 272 Hakan Anderrson

Episode 227, 55 JB Morin

Episode 217, 51 Derek Evely

Episode 212 Boo Schexnayder

Episode 207, 3 Mike Young

Episode 204, 64 James Wild

Episode 192 Sprint Masterclass

Episode 183 Derek Hansen

Episode 175 Jason Hettler

Episode 87 Dan Pfaff

Episode 55 Jonas Dodoo

Episode 15 Carl Valle

 

Hope you have found this article useful.

 

Remember:

  • If you’re not subscribed yet, click here to get free email updates, so we can stay in touch.
  • Share this post using the buttons on the top and bottom of the post. As one of this blog’s first readers, I’m not just hoping you’ll tell your friends about it. I’m counting on it.
  • Leave a comment, telling me where you’re struggling and how I can help

 

Since you’re here…
…we have a small favor to ask.  APA aim to bring you compelling content from the world of sports science and coaching.  We are devoted to making athletes fitter, faster and stronger so they can excel in sport. Please take a moment to share the articles on social media, engage the authors with questions and comments below, and link to articles when appropriate if you have a blog or participate on forums of related topics. — APA TEAM

 

=> Follow us on Facebook

=> Follow us on Instagram

=> Follow us on Twitter

The Language of Coaching

With the end of a third lock down in the UK behind us, we haven’t slowed down in our vision to be the Best Tennis S&C Team in the World.  We are committed to a weekly CPD session and last week Konrad gave us an exceptional presentation, the content of which we wanted to share with you! We welcome back APA coach Konrad McKenzie with a weekly guest post.

 

The Language of Coaching

 

Today, I wanted to talk about a book I read by Nick Winkleman. “The language of Coaching”. This book was great as I wanted to seek ways to “Lean out” coaching cues. This blog will in no way “scratch the surface” of the complexity around topics of attentional focus, skill acquisition and neuroscience. I will highlight areas which I thought were pertinent but I implore you to read the book. The areas I will dive into today will be:

  • 3P performance profile
  • Motor learning vs Motor Performance
  • Coaching and attentional focus
  • Analogies, Internal and External cueing
  • Constraints based/Tactile cues

 

The 3P Performance profile

 

3P performance profile are a series of questions, practitioners would ask when seeking to solve a movement issue. Position, Power and Pattern. Positional questions includes asking whether the subject has the prerequisite mobility and stability to perform the movement. Power is related to the required the strength and power capabilities. Pattern refers to the coordinative and skill acquisition. If you imagine our position and power relate to the car whereas the “Pattern refers to the driver.”

Before I start the blog I want to highlight a few key terms to get us all familiar with motor skill learning:

 

Motor skill learning refers to an adaptive process whereby short term changes in behaviour can be measured and observed during or immediately after a session.

 

Acquisition phase– The acquisition phase is the initial period of improvement. It covers the period of time from when the learner is unable to respond correctly without assistance through to when they are able to respond correctly without assistance. This can be broken down further into stages.

 

Retention Phase- is the Ultimate assessment of motor learning which takes place in the future and athlete is able to demonstrate a skill void of any coaching influence.

 

Motor learning vs Motor performance

 

I presented on this topic at work as I felt it was important. But I asked this question to my colleagues,

How many times have you witnessed an athlete’s temporary change in behaviour? Only to come back next week and feel like they have forgotten everything?

I received a few blank looks but after a warm smile, I knew we all have experienced this. It was a question asked in the book. This uncovers a disparity between Motor performance and motor learning.

Sometimes we pride ourselves on acute changes of behaviour (Behaviour in a skill acquisition sense). However, this is not always indicative of genuine motor learning. This is significant because a regression in motor performance is a sign that the athlete is either dependent on our coaching tactics or isn’t adapting to the learning environment that we have created.  So then begs the question, how do we know that learning is taking place? Well, one of the methods is “Silent Sets.” Put simply a coach may employ silence in the athlete’s sets and gauge whether learning has taken place.

 

Coaching and attentional focus

 

“Attention is the currency of learning where mental investments determine motor returns”

 

When cueing athletes or explaining drills we aim to capture, keep and direct attention. The effectiveness of a cue is anchored to the accuracy and vividness of the imagery it provokes. Accuracy in this case requires the cue to capture the most relevant features of the movement an accurate representation of the desired outcome. I personally think of this as a difference between a Shotgun and a Sniper. Really good coaches seem to be snipers. This then moves on to where we direct our attention. If we notice a technical error, logic would tell us (coach and athlete) to zoom in on that problem. However, this creates a “Zoom fallacy”. Where the more our cues zoom into the technical error, the harder it is to change. “The closer you get to an elephant, the harder it is to know you are looking at an elephant”

 

 

Analogies

 

An analogy is a comparison between one thing and another, typically used for the purposes of explaining, it does have an interesting effect on the brain. Evidence suggests that language can literally put motion on the mind, providing support that analogies may help an athlete understand an unfamiliar pattern by learning it in terms of a familiar one. As you will see, an analogy is a sort of mental molecule that helps us make meaning. Analogies power our minds, allowing us to use association and comparison to expand and refine both our knowledge of the world and the way we move through it. Take these two for example, in relation to acceleration.

 

(Accelerate like a plane taking off)                          

 

Internal/External cueing

Now, we understand the power of analogies we can move nicely to internal and external cueing. Internally focused cues draw attention to muscles and body parts. For example, extending a knee, firing a quad or squeezing a glute. Externally focused cues, on the other hand, draw attention to the environment around the body. For example, pushing the ground away or driving the body off the line. Look below for some examples of internal and external cues.

 

Internally focused cues
DB Bench press – “Extend your elbows faster”
Leg action acceleration- “punch your knees up & Forward”
Hip Hinge lowering phase- “Keep the bar close to your thighs”
Pull up “At the top of the pull, squeeze your shoulder blades down and back”
Externally focused cues
“Drive upward as if to shatter a pane of glass”
“Blast toward the finish”
“Hide your front pockets”
“At the top, bend the bar like an old school strong man”

 

From this we can see a nice differentiation, with the same exercises. Nick is in favour of externally Focussed cues, he believes they are “Stickier” (Sticks in the athlete’s mind).

Constraints based cues

 

This wasn’t mentioned so much in the book, however, I found it had relevance. Constraints based cues. I was searching online to find a “Sniper” definition and here is what I found:

The CLA articulates that through the interaction of different constraints – task, environment, and performer – a learner will self-organise in attempts to generate effective movement solutions. (Renshaw, Ian, Keith Davids, Elissa Phillips, and Hugo Kerherve, 2011).

So by changing parameters such as the task or environment we can find effective movement solutions with minimal talking. A slight caveat to this (and some anecdotal experiences) is that the body will ALWAYS solve a movement issue however:

“The assumption that the body will figure out the best way to do something is a big jump to make.”  – Chass pipit (Professional Baseball coach)

Often this is through compensatory mechanisms which are sometimes maladaptive. Just remember the good old strength and conditioning saying “Context is king.” However, it is safe to surmise that using a constraints led approach coupled with appropriately timed (and amount!) cueing could lead to optimal results.

Terminal vs Concurrent Feedback

 

Again, this did not have a major spotlight in the book but it has relevance. Terminal feedback refers to the feedback received after a movement is completed. Tasks which are acyclical in nature will lean towards terminal feedback. Concurrent feedback is experienced by the performer whilst completing the action, anyone wanting to know more on this should watch the video below.

 

 

This blog is in no way meant to replicate any parts of the book, for that matter is doesn’t even do it justice, full credit goes to Nick Winkleman for a stunning read. I wanted to conclude this blog by relaying the questions I ask myself when coaching athletes or anyone for that matter.

 

Could I of said it differently?

How can I have a leaner approach to cueing?

How do I assess genuine motor learning has taken place, in this instance?

 

Thanks for reading guys,

Konrad McKenzie

Strength and Conditioning coach.

Liked This Blog?

You might like other blogs on this topic from APA:

APA review of the Middlesex Students S&C conference 2014

The Dubious Rise of the Corrective Exercise ”Pseudo-Physio” Posing as a Trainer- My thoughts

as well as two recommended articles:

This article on weak Glutes during Squatting

And this one on Exercise Modifications 

 

Do you feel that this would be a perfect time to work on the weak links that you have been avoiding? The things that you know you should be doing that you keep putting off? Would you like us to help you with movement screening and an injury prevention program? Then click on the link below and let us help you!

? TRAIN WITH APA ?

Aspiring Pro Training Support Packages

 

 

Follow me on instagram @konrad_mcken

Follow Daz on instagram @apacoachdaz

 

Remember:
  • If you’re not subscribed yet, click here to get free email updates, so we can stay in touch.
  • Share this post using the buttons on the top and bottom of the post. As one of this blog’s first readers, I’m not just hoping you’ll tell your friends about it. I’m counting on it.
  • Leave a comment, telling me where you’re struggling and how I can help

 

Since you’re here…
…we have a small favor to ask.  APA aim to bring you compelling content from the world of sports science and coaching.  We are devoted to making athletes fitter, faster and stronger so they can excel in sport. Please take a moment to share the articles on social media, engage the authors with questions and comments below, and link to articles when appropriate if you have a blog or participate on forums of related topics. — APA TEAM

 

=> Follow us on Facebook

=> Follow us on Instagram

=> Follow us on Twitter